Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PassGo Technologies
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was deletion of this article lacking sources to support assertions of notability. GRBerry 20:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] PassGo Technologies
Prodded; later removed by a single-purpose-account. Company seems to be purely promotional without notability. -WarthogDemon 01:30, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Two claims to notability asserted. I can't verify that this company is on Software Magazine's list due to paywall. The second, a review of product, is insufficient to avoid charges that this is a WP:ADVERT. Delete unless something more substantial arises. Alba 01:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I don't find the claims of notability here impressive - the 360th largest software company? The company isn't even publicly traded. Out! Brianyoumans 04:57, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletions and list of Software-related deletions. -- Gavin Collins 20:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not notable. • Lawrence Cohen 21:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Private company partnering with Vasco[1]. Vasco is listed on NASDAQ.[2] [3]. Article needs much work but company is notable by association, I think. Desperately needs verifiable citations. -- • • • Blue Pixel 03:19, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- A listing on the NASDAQ is not very convincing; many small companies are listed there. Originally the NASDAQ was principally companies too small or risky to be listed on the major exchanges, and I believe the listing requirements are still substantially less strict than the NYSE. Brianyoumans 00:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- The company and CEO, John Rainford, are also closely linked to Symantec. Symantec is just another little fish in the NASDAQ pond, I suppose, but PassGo Technologies seems to have a lot of strong associations. I still vote keep. -- • • • Blue Pixel 01:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- A listing on the NASDAQ is not very convincing; many small companies are listed there. Originally the NASDAQ was principally companies too small or risky to be listed on the major exchanges, and I believe the listing requirements are still substantially less strict than the NYSE. Brianyoumans 00:29, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable company. Keb25 07:31, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - advert, no sources to verify. Stifle (talk) 19:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
