Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paolo Mendoza

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. CitiCat ♫ 00:25, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paolo Mendoza

Paolo Mendoza (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable blogger. Book is self published, no indication that it set any records in the Phillipines or anywhere else. No reliable sources to verify the article. Article is edited in a great part by the subject. Fails WP:V, WP:BIO and WP:COI. CosmicPenguin (Talk) 03:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete unless somebody can show significant coverage. Being named an emerging blogger by another blogger is not really a claim to notability Corpx 09:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 11:49, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete Apparently started by himself, full of buzzwords and peacock words, completely non-notable despite of the article's claim of "known throughout the world". Lilac Soul (talk • contribs • count) 14:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I'm from the Philippines but I never heard of him in the news. Google only gave his blog Lenticel (talk) 02:46, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
  • delete or replace the article with the Philippine Basketball Association player of the same person... unless they're same person. --Howard the Duck 06:17, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete. Not yet that notable. Maybe in the future, but at this point he doesn't have anything to distinguish him from the hundreds of bloggers in Manila by WP standards. --- Tito Pao 04:34, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.