Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PanDemonium
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Delete as clear consensus: non notable music group. — Deckiller 05:04, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] PanDemonium
Contested db-band, yet another non-notable musical group that thinks it needs an encyclopedia entry. VoiceOfReason 19:08, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete with {{db-band}}. In its current form it fails WP:MUSIC, WP:V, WP:VAIN..."we are gonna play our second gig tonight" (from the talk page) kinda seals the deal that this really is a (currently) non-notable band. Recreate if/when this cover band ever becomes notable. -- Scientizzle 19:16, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - No claims to notability. Name is too common to do an effective websearch. Pretty clearly not the 70's/80's British group on AllMusic - Richfife 19:18, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- Comment I originally flagged for speedy deletion, but the article creator cleared it. It's my understanding that once a speedy is contested it must go through the AfD process; please correct me if I'm mistaken. VoiceOfReason 19:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nope, it's proposed deletions (using {{prod}}) which have to be taken to AfD if the tag is removed. Speedy tags can be re-applied, it is the responsibility of whoever removes the tag to explain why the article isn't a speedy candidate. -- AJR | Talk 19:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've done the same thing before, too. Sometimes this is the only way to show a particularly motivated article creator that you're on firm ground when applying db tags. As the AfD snowballs, it reduces the perceived culpability of the nominator & deleting admin (and often diffuses the anger of the author). -- Scientizzle 19:41, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nope, it's proposed deletions (using {{prod}}) which have to be taken to AfD if the tag is removed. Speedy tags can be re-applied, it is the responsibility of whoever removes the tag to explain why the article isn't a speedy candidate. -- AJR | Talk 19:32, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- Comment I originally flagged for speedy deletion, but the article creator cleared it. It's my understanding that once a speedy is contested it must go through the AfD process; please correct me if I'm mistaken. VoiceOfReason 19:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
