Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palpatine's lightsaber duels

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 21:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Palpatine's lightsaber duels

A blow-by-blow description of the fights Palpatine has in the movies. A little too detailed for us I think. DJ Clayworth 19:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Delete fails WP:OR WilyD 20:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. This is unnecessarily detailed info. Wikipedia cannot contain every step of every event in the history of the universe. Travislangley 21:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. --DarkAudit 22:11, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, indiscriminate collection of fancrufty information. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 23:42, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I actually posted a speedy delete on this article, but the original author removed it. I'm glad someone else caught it. --Natalie 23:43, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Looks like the author actually edited it abit so it aint so detailed. now i think the delete should fail. - jan. 28, Dillion Ryan
This comment was posted by the article's author, who did the 'editing'. Still way too detailed. Still delete. DJ Clayworth 17:28, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Looks like the author, DILLION RYAN, i presume, shortaned it to one paragraph, detailed, but no too detailed now, KEEP IT
    • Comment. Regardless of the detail, it violates the POV policy. This thing is full of opinion (e.g., "excellent"). No matter what, Wikipedia is not supposed to be a collection of every detail on earth. If someone wants to note Palpatine's swordplay skills, he/she/they should do so in Palpatine's article. Travislangley 23:58, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.