Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palmcasting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No consensus, so redirect to Podcasting. Because this is no consensus (with a potential to be AfDed in the future), I won't even devote a sentence to Palmcasting in the Podcasing article. --Deathphoenix 01:48, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Palmcasting

Non-notable neologism for some yet unthought-of variation of the podcasting. Delete if at all possible. Otherwise merge. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 01:56, Jan. 26, 2006

  • Keep Palmcasting has 197 hits, it's just new. Give it a chance to rev up. It's not a hoax, for what it's worth. Ruby 02:03, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect and include a sentence in the main article on podcasting. It's not enough of a significant phenomenon to warrant its own article. Night Gyr 02:20, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to podcasting. Mention it there -- Astrokey44|talk 02:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Palmcasting has 197 hits. Create the article if it becomes notable.--Ezeu 02:44, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, failing that merge + redirect to podcasting. So is this how words are made up now? Put it on wikipedia and hope it revs up? --Timecop 02:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
    • What I meant was, this podcasting techology is changing so fast, by the time this AfD is archived, palmcasting could be the new way for people to blog and it will be in Time and Newsweek and what-have-you. We can establish that palmcasting is at least not a hoax, and let the article lie fallow, and make a final decision in a few months. Ruby 04:30, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Astrokey44. --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 03:49, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete - pathetic... Cptchipjew 04:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, nn. incog 04:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, always a chance to recreate the article if this ever catches on.   ⇔   | | ⊕ ⊥ (t-c-e) 04:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - made up word, 100% non-notable -- Femmina 08:24, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable. --Terence Ong 10:13, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Astrokey44 -Chairman S. 10:45, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete this, nn. Eusebeus 11:36, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect it and mention it in the list of podcast-related portmanteaus. If it ever revs up (sorry, couldn't resist) and is worth an article, it can subsequently be started then. Proto t c 11:37, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect Per Proto ComputerJoe 21:31, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. N-- JJay 23:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
Would you like to have the honors of expanding it? --timecop 06:52, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • How kind of you to ask. And what a great honor coming from a fearless leader such as yourself. I'd ask for your help, but your user page informs me that you are dead. What a shame. -- JJay 07:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Don't feed the trolls, timecop. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 14:05, Jan. 28, 2006
  • Delete not notable --凸 06:54, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Try back a year from now, let's see if it's notable then.. --Depakote 12:52, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete We have podcasting. We don't need palmcasting. Completely uninformative, useless and (as others have stated) non-notable. Every combination of technologies does not need its own buzzword and article on wikipedia. Viscid 06:07, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. *drew 16:15, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.