Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacific lodge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedied. humblefool®Deletion Reform 02:58, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Pacific lodge
advertising, not notable 66.216.68.28 16:27, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy, since it is pretty much a promo and the article is pure spam with the number to call for reservations. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 16:28, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy as per Zscout370. --BradBeattie 16:32, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy as per Zscout Naturenet | Talk 16:35, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, advert and not notable but doesn't meet criteria for speedy deletion. --KFP 16:38, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- If having "Reservations for King Pacific Lodge are made through our Vancouver Sales Office. Above you will find a Reservations Form that can be submitted via fax to 604.987.5472. After your reservation is made, we ask that you complete a Personal Preferences Form so that we can make sure that all arrangements are made to make your visit perfect." is not criteria for speedy deletion, then I have no clue what is. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 16:41, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- According to this, [1], it was deleted earlier. Zscout370 (Sound Off) 16:43, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- I would certainly like to see this article speedily deleted. However, according to Wikipedia deletion policy, advertisements masquerading as articles should be dealt with at VfD (although this article does a poor job at masquerading: it is blatant spam copied directly from [2] and is thus a possible copyvio). --KFP 17:39, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- It has been deleted, so, it looks like it can be closed now. (Which, I notice many articles coming here are speedied after they are listed here. Should we have a Proposed Deletions page? Zscout370 (Sound Off) 02:27, 19 July 2005 (UTC)
- I would certainly like to see this article speedily deleted. However, according to Wikipedia deletion policy, advertisements masquerading as articles should be dealt with at VfD (although this article does a poor job at masquerading: it is blatant spam copied directly from [2] and is thus a possible copyvio). --KFP 17:39, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
