Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PPStream (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WjBscribe 08:34, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] PPStream (2nd nomination)

PPStream (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Fails WP:WEB, I don't see a reason for notablility here. Has already been deleted once in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PPStream —— Eagle101 Need help? 06:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, strike two, same pitch. It's no more notable now than then. Realkyhick 06:56, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and salt the earth. Reads and feels like an advertisement. MaxSem 09:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep Possibly not in great use in the US, this is very popular in Europe. Additionally, I am unable to find any sort of discussion anywhere with regards to improving the article. AfD is a last resort, not a first option. Cloveoil 13:06, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep As above, incredibly popular software in Europe, especially for watching football matches that aren't being screened live. Google isn't notability, but PPStream returns 3 million hits, and even 'PPStream Football' over 56,000. The problem is sourcing, as a lot of articles are either reviews of the software, forums, blogs, or in Chinese, but I found [1], [2] & [3] in a couple of minutes, and there's probably a lot more. EliminatorJR Talk 17:25, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep this is one of the most ubiquitous pieces of software in Europe & certainly notable. - Iridescenti (talk to me!) 19:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Two "sources" above are blogs, third one is trivial. One Night In Hackney303 21:29, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, its mentioned in at least one scientific paper [4]. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 23:04, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.