Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/P.K. Winsome

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Colbert Report. Krimpet (talk) 03:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] P.K. Winsome

P.K. Winsome (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Occassional character on The Colbert Report. "Biography" consists of a series of jokes from the show. No independent, reliable sources are cited and apparently none exist . Lack of sources means that Wikipedia cannot do an article using sourced analysis and explaining the real world implications of this character, as required by Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 23:23, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Deleteper nom. --Guinnog 00:09, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Unless source outside the Colbert Report discussing this character specifically can be provided. --Daniel J. Leivick 00:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • redirect to the The Colbert Report or a page on minor characters of the show. I accept that sources can be provided to cover this character, but I'm not seeing a reason to have it stand alone. FrozenPurpleCube 00:44, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable. — Wenli 01:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to The Colbert Report per WP:FICT. Minor fictional characters should be listed either in a list article or in the source article, and this character is in the source article. Otto4711 01:17, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to The Colbert Report. Clearly a minor character, therefore, per WP:FICT, belongs in the list of characters there, which the character already is. Expand the one sentence there with some of the content at this article. GoodnightmushTalk
  • Redirect to The Colbert Report, much as a minor recurring character for other television programs would be. (Note: this solution would be better than simply deleting because it seems to discourage recreation, especially by newer editors.) --Kinu t/c 02:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to The Colbert Report per WP:FICT. Sr13 (T|C) ER 03:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Colbert Report --St.daniel talk 10:54, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect- to Colbet report also. Retiono Virginian 16:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Redirect in agreement with the reasons listed above. Acalamari 18:11, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.