Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Owen mcateer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedied as A7 --Doc (?) 13:26, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Owen mcateer

No claim to notability.--Carabinieri 12:31, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

• Why? (unsigned vote by User:80.44.124.199)
  • Well, why is this article notable?--Carabinieri 12:34, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• To clarify, article-creator-who-probably-is-but-possibly-is-not-Owen-McAteer: the article doesn't tell us why Owen McAteer deserves a Wikipedia article. It's just his birthdate and location. For someone to be in Wikipedia, there has to be something noteworthy about them. Google indicates that Owen McAteer is a reporter for the Newcastle Evening Chronicle, which isn't notable enough, and even if it was, this isn't the same Owen McAteer, because this Owen McAteer is only nineteen. Sorry, guy. Delete. DS 12:47, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Isn't this a speedy criteria now? Sonic Mew | talk to me 13:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
  • In fact, looking at the article history, it was marked as such, but the tag was removed by 80.44.124.199 (talk · contribs) Sonic Mew | talk to me 13:24, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
    • ...and while I was wrting that, it was speedied anyway! Sonic Mew | talk to me 13:25, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

I'm getting faster --Doc (?) 13:26, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.