Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outfake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge and redirect. There is no plausible place to merge this, however, so I am going to simply make it a redirect. AdamBiswanger1 03:28, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Outfake

It looks like nonsense to me. Kerowyn ^{Leave a note} 00:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and rewrite - ICE Magazine writeup on Beatles outfakes and bootlegs and a book on music history which delves into the Beatles bootlegs and "outfakes" as well as other notable points in music history around the 60's, 70's and 80's. Torinir _{( Ding my phone My support calls E-Support Options )} 00:40, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to the Beatles article, trivial without the context.--Peta 02:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge 50/50 split on search engine results - 50% reference to Wiki, the other 50% reference to the Beatles. Seems most appropriate merging with the Beatles as above. QuiteUnusual 06:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge Outfakes seem to be solely related to The Beatles. --Kitch ^{(Talk | Contrib)} 12:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Peta, Kitch. --Dhartung | Talk 14:05, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect, no merge. Not even important enough for a sentence in the Beatles article. Recury 14:24, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
• Merge per Peta. Wikipediarules2221 23:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.