Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otakukin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Otakukin
An original research soapbox article for a small self proclaimed demographic which has no reliable sources for verifiability or notability. NeoFreak 20:33, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to otherkin with brief mention there. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 21:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Question. What sourcable and verifiable information would you recommend merging into the article? NeoFreak 21:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Basically a single sentence to the effect that "Otakukin are otherkin who believe themselves to have the spirits of fictional characters, rather than creatures." I'm pretty sure that's been said somewhere. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 22:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Not from a reliable source. Even if it was there is still no notablity. NeoFreak 05:59, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Basically a single sentence to the effect that "Otakukin are otherkin who believe themselves to have the spirits of fictional characters, rather than creatures." I'm pretty sure that's been said somewhere. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 22:06, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Question. What sourcable and verifiable information would you recommend merging into the article? NeoFreak 21:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete this junk, and note places like [1] in the otherkin article. --humblefool® 00:01, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Swow 04:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Silly attempt to justify a made-up word. MightyAtom 06:42, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. No other comment. Danny Lilithborne 11:38, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as neologism. No point trying to merge it into otherkin: it used to be mentioned there, but was recently deleted due to the exact same concerns that led to this AfD. — Haeleth Talk 16:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
