Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orchids of Western Australia

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep because the page had been edited so that the reason for deletion did no longer apply. - Andre Engels 11:58, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Orchids of Western Australia

This article is written in such a way that it's nothing more than linkspam. I've got no problem with the subject material, but it needs to be written in a much more encyclopeadic fashion. I've removed the URL to defeat the linkspamming. jmd 05:06, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

• Speedy under WP:CSD A3. --Blackcap | talk 05:11, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. Western Australia has a number of orchid species see [1]. However, this article tells us nothing about them other than Orchids of Western Australia refers to orchids in Western Australia and would deserve deletion if not improved during the discussion period. However, might vote to keep a decent stub if it discussed the types of orchid in that state. Could someone please contact me if article has been improved.Capitalistroadster 05:45, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. --Apyule 07:02, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand. User Apyule has turned this into a nice little stub with references. Capitalistroadster 07:12, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the credit, but Jonathan de Boyne Pollard did more than I did. --Apyule 07:26, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep rewritten article. Ambi 08:00, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, although it would probably be better discussed in a Flora of Western Australia article.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 08:19, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. The rewrite looks fine (perhaps a little overlinked). - Mgm|^(talk) 09:15, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Now it's got some material, I'll vote for a keep. jmd 11:16, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.