Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 15:24, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Opo

Neologism Koffieyahoo 06:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Kalani ^[talk] 06:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable. DarthVader 09:03, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. WP is not for things you made up after school one day. Paddles ^T_C 10:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete from the article recently created. Wikipedia should not be used in an attempt to coin or popularise things. (if only we could make that more clear to people creating articles) Ydam 12:17, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NFT. "Recently created" obviously translates to "I just thought of this". JIP | Talk 12:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Hel-oPo-, pluze delete the non notable word article. --Starionwolf 18:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this and make redirect to Hokianga which deals with the real Opo in some detail. BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 01:04, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• delete/redirect as per BL. I'm mildly surorised we don't have a page on Opo the dolphin, but it is covered on the Hokianga page. Grutness...wha? 02:01, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 03:34, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.