Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Operation: Cliff Clavin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Two of the three keep and expand votes were disregarded; the first one was counted, but probably shouldn't have been - it's inclusion was immaterial to the result. Mindmatrix 23:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Operation: Cliff Clavin

nnbio on an unknown defunct band Reid A. 06:48, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as NN. The JPS 10:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per above and WP:MUSIC. Punkmorten 15:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand I don't know much about the band, but the ideals and beliefs of the band go against the definitions of notability that Wikipedia uses. That does not mean that they are not a legitimate band. They put out several records, and their members are all still active in the folk punk scene. Superradjoe 09:40, 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand As has been stated on behalf other Plan-It-X bands nomintaed for deletion, I do not believe that this is a significant enough deviance from those provisions to warrant deletion. The band has done an internetional tour, as well as countless US tours and released several albums. Those provisions actually work against a band like this who choose not to become "notable", so to speak, due to their personal beliefs about music and life. They are very prominently known among people in the underground punk scene and have a sizable national fanbase. thejer 15 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and expand This band is a huge source of inspiration to DIY punk around the world. Just because they don't fit into the cookie-cutter description of success that you have does not mean that they were not successful. WikiPedia is about providing information to the world, and taking this page down would be counterproductive to those goals. allergic 15 December 2005 (UTC)

-*Comment-seems like sock puppets to me?-Reid A. 00:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

• • I'm not too sure about that, since the punk scene has been rejuvenated in the last few years. As for the AfD, I'd suggest waiting two weeks to allow for possible expansion, and if nothing substantive arrives, then delete it. As it is now presented, this is not an article... and I doubt it would qualify as a stub. Two sentences do not an article make. B.Wind 00:40, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:MUSIC --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:58, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.