Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Onno Shomoy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Petros471 18:53, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Onno Shomoy

Is every single music album in the world going to have its very own page on Wikipedia? ImpuMozhi 04:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Per above ImpuMozhi 04:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The band, Artcell, has established its notability. A separate article for this album is the only logical location for detailed information on the album itself as well ast track listings. Both David Bowie and Rod Stewart has separate articles for 22 of his albums. Rod also has seperate articles for several of his singles. To use a less-popular example, the band Iced Earth has 7 articles on its albums, many of them stubby tracklistings like this one. So, the precedent has been set that if a band is notable enough for an article, so are its albums. Adambiswanger1 04:52, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Artcell for same reasons as given in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oniket Prantor. Paddles ^T_C 10:07, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, and the answer is yes; it is pretty standard practice that albums by performers meeting the WP:MUSIC criteria are suitable material for standalone articles.--Isotope23 18:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Notable band, so the album is also notable. Merging album info, even if there is little else beside production notes and track listings, would lead to long, unwieldy band articles. An exception could be if only one album was released. --Joelmills 04:19, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The first progressive rock band in a country of about 140 million people? That sounds notable to me. Again, I've never heard of them, probably will never get one of their songs BUT BUT BUT to use my own preferences to make AfD decisions would fail to work as part of the WikiProject Countering Systemic Bias: WP:CSB. I think that a comparable band in the US (or Japan or Germany or Brazil) would not have its albums submitted to an AfD discussion because each of these countries, more so than Bangladesh, has a certain inherent apparent notability among many people in the world....but that's systemic bias. Interlingua ^talk 02:26, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Adambiswanger1 and Joelmills. Spacepotato 06:39, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• keep please this is notabel enough here erasing makes no sense at all Yuckfoo 01:23, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.