Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Online medical education

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No need for the debate to continue, with the very strong consensus shown here. Mangojuicetalk 13:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Online medical education

Online medical education (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Nominating this article for deletion under the WP:NOT policy, specifically 1.4: Not a Soapbox. This entry is not an encyclopedia article, but rather a very POV essay written in support of the concept of online medical schools. The author is the same as the author of World Health Medical School, and one can only assume that this essay was written in support of his online medical school. At this time, there are no accredited online medical schools. Contested prod. Leuko 00:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per Leuko. Also seems to push the original essay boundaries of WP:NOT. -- MarcoTolo 00:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete This is an essay, and a very POV essay. Also, although I recognise that this is not in itself a reason for delete, his basic premise regarding the viability of on-line medical education is hopelessly flawed.--Anthony.bradbury 00:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. It is truly a very POV essay, as said by Anthony Bradbury. Bigtop 00:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It's an essay, with facts and references, but not an article Pleclech 01:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete ack, per nom, the article is basically a POV essay. Arjun 01:13, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Everything's already been said.Ganfon 01:23, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - per nom. Ronbo76 01:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete The original nominator expressed my sentiments. --Ox-Puller 02:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. --Qwertyca 02:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per everybody. Just H 02:07, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom purple monkey dishwasher. JuJube 02:39, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per all you wonderful people. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:57, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, fails WP:NPOV. JRHorse 03:37, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:SOAPBOX -- Selmo (talk) 05:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as a personal essay. JIP | Talk 05:47, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per all. Maxamegalon2000 06:08, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per all.SetofFive 07:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete per all. -- Greaser 08:18, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete OR. Doesn't even contain information on (or sourced criticism of) continuing medical education provided online by notable organizations such as Emedicine. --Charlene 13:36, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.