Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Riverside Drive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. There was nearly a consensus to delete. Redirecting and keeping the history allows someone to carry out a merge (the other possible outcome of this debate) if they wish, and consensus at the destination article allows. Petros471 16:30, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] One Riverside Drive

One of a series of articles on buildings in Windsor, Ontario (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solidarity Towers for one that has already been deleted). It is not of any great height or any great architectural importance and seems indistinguishable from thousands of other office buildlings in the world. Indrian 18:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

• Comment. Article hints at controversy. Maybe part of it could be merged elsewhere? BFD1 18:32, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
  • If the controversy was important to the Windsor community, then I am sure a place could be found for it in a scetion on urban renewal in that city, however, the building itself does not become notable because of that in my opinion. Indrian 18:37, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable building. Akradecki 19:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Windsor, Ontario, likely enough information on the building to rate inclusion in the parent article. JYolkowski // talk 21:48, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
• Merge with Windsor, Ontario, since it has quite a coloured and controversial past, and is of note for Windsorites. Merge it into Windsor's main article, with a sub-section for its tall buildings? User:Raccoon Fox • Talk • Stalk 00:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete There are a number of errors in this entry i.e. the building is now fully occupied, it was never intended to be called the Chrysler Building, the original 32 storey drawing was just a proposal, etc. Jc8025 19:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.