Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivia kennett

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Deleted before afd discussion officially closed

[edit] Olivia kennett

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}

Delete. No notability. Google brings up 4 results, and none of them seems to have anything to do with the subject of the article. Previously prod'ded by User:Sparsefarce: "Non notable artist. Google search comes up with her (or another Olivia Kennett from New England) being quoted in an article about JFK, which had nothing to do with art. Also an article or two about a health instructor named Olivia Kennet. Nothing else found." ... discospinster talk 00:30, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Non-notable, probably vanity, article. Needs to be deleted as such. --WillMak050389 00:40, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • I have viewed one of Olivia Kennett's "art zines", which I picked up at one of my local coffee shops. Although she is certainly not well-known, I think she will be in the future. This article could easily stay put and have importance at a later date. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.175.162.145 (talk • contribs) .
Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. What might be notable in the future is not what WP is about. Sparsefarce 05:05, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • do not delete kennett is a scenester gaining significance in the greater boston area. this article is relevant. i think just because she doesn't bring up any art related google results doesn't necessarily mean she is not a person of importance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ohguerrilla (talk • contribs) .
  • It does, however, mean her importance is not Verifiable. Verifiability is an absolute rule here. Fan-1967 03:37, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

DELETE 65.175.162.145 06:33, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete with no prejudice for recreation. Boston has a nice art scene and if she is truly "up and coming" then her time will come and Wikipedia will be here to note it. Till then... 205.157.110.11 06:44, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment -- looks like someone speedied it. --M@rēino 14:01, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.