Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oh teh noes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was:Delete Prodego ^talk 17:12, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oh teh noes

I dont believe it to be usefull, do we ealy need a article about a silly phrase such as that? Matthew Fenton (t) 08:49, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

• No, we do not. Delete or possibly redirect to the snake pit that is List of Internet slang. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 08:55, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, do not redirect (as it isn't a likely search term) and do not transwiki this crap non notable neologism to Wikt, we don't want it. --Rory096 09:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

  With 11,700 relevant Google hits, there is more than a slight chance someone might search for it here, but that does not necessarily make it encyclopedic, hence my delete vote. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Not worth having. It is a very poorly written article! Alan Liefting 09:19, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete once you take out the unverifiable claims to authorship you are left with nothing but a dictionary definition of a slang term. Gwernol 10:05, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not encyclopaedic. Zaxem 10:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Unencyclopedic, non-notable neologism. Jude (talk,contribs,email) 10:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - having read the article, I still don't understand what the term means or its origin. Says it all. Ac@osr 11:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:NEO. --Terence Ong 13:09, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete One of the least-encyclopedic things I've seen on AFD in awhile. I'd speedy it, but it doesn't quite fit any criteria. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:50, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable and very dubious; given that both "oh noes" and "teh" have been around for as long as the internet, it seems rather unlikely that nobody thought of combining them until 2004. — Haeleth Talk 15:51, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.