Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obidala
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 13:37, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Obidala
More slash fancruft. Didn't we just have a spate of those? The name gets about 2,000 Google hits (but many do not refer to this) and the site that it flogs has an Alexa page rank around 3.1 million. MCB 00:33, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Ob-la-di, Obidala? Yeah, delete this fanfictioncruft. Lord Bob 01:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete non-canon fanfic per WP:FICT. -Splashtalk 03:13, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Numa numa iei (you won't take me, and I won't take it -- delete.) ♥purplefeltangel (talk) ♥ (contribs) 03:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete pretty much all fanfic. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:46, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete from all known galaxies. Wile E. Heresiarch 21:39, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed with Starblind this seems to be more or less fan fiction and is really not qualified.
- Delete. Fanfiction fails WP:FICT. Sjakkalle (Check!) 08:14, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Personally, I feel fanfiction has to be as notable as or more notable than The Very Secret Diaries to merit an article. This emphatically does not meet that standard. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 09:06, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Fancruft, and boring noncanon-able fancruft at that. --Maru (talk) 03:32, 3 October 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
