Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nozz-A-La

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. Bucketsofg 19:30, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nozz-A-La

Nozz-A-La (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Delete - fictional beverage, not notable on its own. If it's more important to the plot of one or the other of the things where it's mentioned then it can be described in those articles as appropriate. Otto4711 00:56, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. No attempt to assert or source notability independent of the book it appears in. --Shirahadasha 01:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable outside of Stephen King's works. Not even really that notable inside of them, either. Lankiveil 04:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC).
• Delete per Lankiveil. Pomte 04:52, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Nomination is dead on. --Dennisthe2 05:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not eve very notable in its own series DurinsBane87 05:05, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Nareklm 05:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:28, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete It's hard to put into words my opinion but I agree with the nomination. Tellyaddict 12:40, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as trivia -- Whpq 15:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as A) trivial and B)fictional. --tennisman ^{sign here!} 16:07, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Quite trivial.zadignose 17:19, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.