Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novacom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Punkmorten 11:24, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Novacom

Novacom (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable fictional company. Candy-Panda 12:50, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

• delete definitly a superfluous super-stub, no reason at all why such a small amount of information can't be included in the parent article. SGGH 15:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Daniel.Bryant 04:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete As said above, there is no reason on earth why a 2 sentence stub on a subject with virtually no room for expansion wouldn't be more appropriate as part of the parent article. janejellyroll 04:06, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 05:25, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - no justification for such article. Turgidson 05:55, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.