Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norman Riley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep (nomination withdrawn). Wizardman 21:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Norman Riley
Notability in question since May 2007. Wizardman 20:14, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:25, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep, know nothing about fluid dynamics but a quick glance at hits on [Goolge Scolar] would lead me to believe that this article passes WP:PROF, specific publications that I could quickly find [1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6]. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:02, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems to meet WP:ACADEMIC. ~ Antiselfpromotion (talk) 17:09, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- Keep "Notability in question" is not a reason for deletion, no matter how long the tag has been there. An emeritus professor at a UK university is exceedingly likely to be notable. Some publications should be added. DGG (talk) 17:52, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- I really need to remember to look at Google Scholar before AfD'ing. Could've just done that and established notability with little effort. Nom withdrawn. Wizardman 21:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
