Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nokia 7250

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. --VS talk 22:09, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nokia 7250

Nokia 7250 (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable commercial product; just another cell phone. Insufficient references exist to support a Wikipedia article that is not a review or an advert. Wikipedia is not a cell phone directory. Wikipedia is not a Nokia catalog. Mikeblas (talk) 04:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete, it's a mobile phone. No real notability demonstrated, nor any independent non-trivial sources that are not simply product reviews. Lankiveil (talk) 11:50, 11 January 2008 (UTC).
  • Keep Seems to be even more notable than the 6610i: Google news Colonel Warden (talk) 18:10, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment. Please read WP:WAX. The 6610i is irrelevant; please focus on the subject of this article. -- Mikeblas (talk) 19:58, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. WP should not serve as product catalog. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 22:03, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per Colonel Warden. 23.2M regular Ghits is btw rather impressing. Greswik (talk) 16:13, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep I also agree with Colonel Warden - maybe it just needs a picture and stub for now (to add to the spec sheet) Dj stone (talk) 17:15, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Question. A picture? How does a picture establish notability, or reference any of the claims made in the article? -- Mikeblas (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)
      • Sorry - I didn't mean the picture would establish notability - just that it might help the article since it was basically a spec sheet... Dj stone (talk) 15:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
        • Comment. Spec sheets have pictures, too. So do {{advert}}s. -- Mikeblas (talk) 23:05, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep- I think it deserves to be included in WP, although it does not establish notability. Λua∫Wise (talk) 13:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep- there is a standard set already, phone models have articles.--Him and a dog 21:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.