Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Vaughan2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly (o rly?) 21:19, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nick Vaughan

Nick Vaughan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Was listed early on during Vaughan's term of office but the discussion generated no consensus. Former chairs of party's youth wings don't meet the Wikipedia thresholds for notability - see also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Bristow and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donal Blaney. Timrollpickering 16:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


  • Undecided The notability shouldn't change just because he is out of office, but should he ever have been judged to be notable? The prior AfD was pretty balanced pro & con. I sould say keep if the article had credible references, but I'm not inspired to do the research. --Kevin Murray 21:31, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - for now anyway. If he ends up becoming non-notable then delete, but you never know. David 22:07, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as this is not an office conferring automatic notability. Recreate when career becomes notable. --Dhartung | Talk 22:24, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete "If be becomes non-notable, then delete"? He is already non notable. Chairman of a youth wing of a political party is hardly notable. Resolute 08:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:40, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Non-notable article about unremarkable subject.WindsorFan 09:16, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.