Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newsvine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus; default to keep. Petros471 20:08, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Newsvine

Non-notable website Artw 20:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete for failure to establish notability and advertising. Eddie.willers 20:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. BlueValour 20:50, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and heavy cleanup. Has an Alexa rank around 4'000 and press coverage (e.g. by the WSJ). Sandstein 21:19, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

Also, I see no advertising here. There are no problems with this article. Sandstein 21:21, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. The only notability it now has is that which it shares as a member of a more general category. It has none itself and functions as an add now. The info is appropriate for newspaper but not for an encyclopedia. Interlingua 00:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Then the info should be fixed. That's not a reason to delete a page, that's a reason to mark it for cleanup. -- TheTrueSora 15:01, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete nn. —Khoikhoi 03:59, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Not our best article, but I don't see any advertising. As mentioned by Sandstein, it's a highly-trafficked site. Sean Hayford O'Leary 08:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I can't see any advertising and for such a new site it's hard to develop much further with history etc. Lee 16:54, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep for the same reason we have Digg and Slashdot. Look at its Alexa rating. -- TheTrueSora 13:40, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. For me, just scrapes in per WP:WEB. Batmanand | Talk 15:34, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.