Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neural Reality

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:19, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Neural Reality

Neural Reality (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Unsourced original research. --Infrangible 01:20, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - appears to be WP:OR --Haemo 03:01, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, WP:OR violation. Dppowell 03:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete without prejudice. This appears to be a common 'invention' used as a discussion point, to explore cognition. There is even an attempt at a website, but strangely no further developed than the article. A number of papers mention the concept, but again, to explore other topics. This is too much a dicdef/neologism to stand by itself. That it doesn't even have links to the available web mentions is amazing, but they wouldn't show the concept as a separate domain. Shenme 04:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. The article can be improved and may have to be modified substantially, but the concept appears to be firmly established ([1]). Stammer 06:45, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as a violation of WP:OR. Acalamari 18:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, probably established to support an argument on a messageboard somewhere jamesgibbon 18:37, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete but I'd like to throw in WP:BOLLOCKS as well. Someguy1221 22:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
Bollocks with 188 hits on GScholar.Stammer 17:15, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Just to clarify my previous statement, bollocks for the claim that "Virtual Reality [is] clearly distinguishable from what is perceived as the 'real world.'" Looking at the link provided by Shenme, this may be a misinterpretation of the actual theory, presuming such a concept actually exists in real science. Someguy1221 18:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.