Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Netlynx Technologies

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Majorly (o rly?) 12:34, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Netlynx Technologies

Netlynx Technologies (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article doesn't assert the notability of the organization. Most of it isn't even verified. Wikipedia isn't an infinate resource. Delete GreenJoe 20:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Black Falcon 02:15, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. I have further cleaned up and sourced the article. There is currently little there that isn't verified. If any statement(s) is/are particularly suspect, please point it/them out or remove it/them. -- Black Falcon 21:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment It looks like Netlynx might meet WP:CORP, but it needs some statistics on revenues or numbers of employees. --Gwern (contribs) 21:40 25 February 2007 (GMT) 21:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Sourced, but still it doesn't assert the notability. Googling doesn't turn up much either. It's just domain and hosting provider; being accredited doesn't make it notable. Looks like a WP:COI case to me (created by User:Netlynx, who hasn't made any contribs outside the topic). utcursch | talk 12:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete It's a private company that fails WP:N. There are no independent published sources that give any distinctive facts to establish notability. Mereda 17:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep Should be kept as long as the article is cleaned up. Stephenchou0722 15:09, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Are you volunteering? The problem is, we "keep" to clean up, and no one does the work. GreenJoe 16:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.