The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Fails WP:N, can find no third-party non-trivial reliable sources to give this magazine notability in an encyclopaedic context Russavia 10:04, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Seems pointless and sounds like an ad for the magazine. CRocka05 17:11, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.