Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo tourism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete JERRY talk contribs 05:08, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Neo tourism

Neo tourism (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article has had a tag noting that it does not meet the 'general notability guideline' for more than 3 months. The phrase 'Neo tourism' has not been shown to be commonly used in any notable setting, and the article reads very much like text written simply to promote travel-related business. The only references are non-neutral links also connected to the tourism industry. This one should go. Brando130 (talk) 06:48, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Comment, I dont think it is a non-notable article. There are enough references-Rustam 07:01, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Not that I have to have the last word (so apologies in advance) , but I can't read that and not point out that none of those 'references' seem to even use the term Neo tourism (as opposed to, maybe, just saying 'new tourism') Brando130 (talk) 17:29, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Keep and Possible move to Wiktionary, The article could be kept and probably moved to Wiktionary. It seems to be more like a definition -Rustam 07:05, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete. Word invented in a marketing department, full of marketese inside. Pavel Vozenilek (talk) 17:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per Pavel Vozenilek.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 03:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Transwiki. A Google search reveals at least a couple hits that the word is being used - most probably a neologism (ha!), let them fight it out there. Tanthalas39 (talk) 04:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete or Transwiki. Agree with Tanthalas39.147.175.98.213 (talk) 00:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.