Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nendasji
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete - no assertion of notability, no reliable sources, possible original research, no verifiability. Houses of worship are not inherently notable. Bearian (talk) 17:55, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Nendasji
Notability — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 17:59, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment - I don't think this is a sufficient rationale for deletion from the nominator. matt91486 (talk) 18:08, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Though the nomination may be terse, I am inclined to agree. I came upon the article tagged for speedy deletion for criteria WP:CSD#A1, but was just able to figure out enough context for the article to survive. I then set about trying to locate additional sources and failed to come up with anything. I think AfD is the right process for this, since it gives time for sources in other languages or with other spellings to be produced to verify that this is, indeed, a notable temple. I'll be watching, of course, in case that happens. As it stands, this temple not only doesn't verify, but doesn't even seem to imply encyclopedic importance. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 18:25, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep: Yes, it's a very underdeveloped stub but I can't see why Wikipedia shouldn't have comprehensive information on temples (especially if it allows articles from Jimmy Wales on Mzoli's Meats). Jonathan Luckett (talk) 10:41, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
