Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neko nya nya

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete nya nya. --Coredesat 02:26, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Neko nya nya

Neko nya nya (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No assertion of notability, however, unfortunately does not qualify for the narrow definition of A7. Leuko 16:27, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

  ATTENTION!

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on a forum, please note that this is not a majority vote, but rather a discussion to establish a consensus among Wikipedia editors on whether a page is suitable for this encyclopedia. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines to help us decide this, and deletion decisions are made on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

Nonetheless, you are welcome to participate and express your opinions. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments by suspected single-purpose accounts can be tagged using {{subst:spa|username}}
  • Comment Since the AfD, the article seems to have changed dramatically. Delete per WP:HOAX. I can't seem to find any Grove Gazette that backs this. Looks like some school kid's (ongoing) prank.--Ispy1981 16:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • the grove gazette was an english magazine made by our council for school kids so and its still going go in any newsagents in w.yoks and you'll find it. Kohaku-x 16:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 17:02, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Magazines by "council for school kids" avaliable only in "newsagents in w.yoks" are not notable Corpx 17:08, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per Wikipedia is not for things made up in school and a hoax. The article is completely unverifiable. P.S. Does anyone else notice that this outline copies the story line of Tokyo Mew Mew? --Farix (Talk) 17:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • My son used to recieve the grove gazzete its been going where i live for years. I remeber that manga series. I have reviewed the page of tokyo mew mew and from what i can see the only thing that is alike is the fact that one of the main characters has been infused with the DNA of a cat.Reynaldsaimee 17:46, 23 June 2007 (UTC) — Reynaldsaimee (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Comment The above user created their account five minutes before posting here and has only posted here.--Ispy1981 18:00, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Hence the {{spa}} tag. :-) Leuko 18:04, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Ah, I see. The spa tag was added while I was checking on the user.--Ispy1981 20:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

how much evidence do you need? [1]

i can provide as much info as you like. if you seriously think someone would make something like that up you are very mistaken. the school was grove lea,hemsworth,w.yorks the head master mrs mcnichol and the other producers and workers for the gazzete were kane rush, amber milnes, georgina akyroyd and kim mitchum if you need any more info ask me on my email: (email and phone removed. Posting personal contact info is not a good ideaEdison 19:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC)) 18:19, 23 June 2007 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lovescene123 (talk • contribs).— Lovescene123 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  • Delete Wikipedeia is not for things made up in school one day. Edison 19:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Ditto. Chris 19:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • i dont see why smaller things cant be put on an encyclopedia. just because you may or may not think its important doesn't mean *someone else won't.smaller things should not be tossed aside because there small. it's just like tossing something aside for its height,age or physical factors.Kohaku-x 19:51, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • here's the website http://neko-nya-nya.piczo.comKohaku-x 19:53, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • It doesnt belong in an encylopedia because it is not notable. Corpx 19:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • That poorly made website only proves that the topic is not notable. Corpx 19:55, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • fine then delete it i can't be bothered arguing with a load of internet geeks about a manga series but dont you dare dis the site!!thos drawings took ages aswell as the whole comic me and most of the people who got the gazette think its important. if it gets deleted i hope your happy. i bet you couldnt draw much better when you were 12 anyway comment added by Kohaku-x
  • Comment Could the above comment be contrued as a form of db-author (CSD G7)? --Ispy1981 20:52, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • For starters, knock it off with the sockpuppets, it reflect poorly on you. Second, the lack of professional quality of the website is a very good indication to us that the subject is not notable. Any idiot can put up a website, so a website alone is not proof of anything. That is why Wikipedia relies on reliable third-party sources. Third, I remind you to be civil and do not engaging in personal attack on other editors. --Farix (Talk) 20:47, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete for absolute lack of reliable sources to back this up. Even if there were, the article itself is illiterate and practically incomprehensible. Sorry, kids, but WP:MADEUP pretty much rules here pretty clearly applies in this case. --Nonstopdrivel 20:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
    In the kids' defense, though, I will say that as crappy as that website is, I couldn't have done Flash animation at 12. But that's irrelevant anyway. --Nonstopdrivel 20:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete but I don't think this meets any of the speedy criteria per se. Pascal.Tesson 21:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete does not meet WP:NOTABLILITY (Duane543 04:15, 24 June 2007 (UTC))
  • Delete this article does not belong on wikipedia because its not really notable but you have to give the kid some credit those drawings and that site isn't that bad to say that there only 12 . Missnamine 14:57, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete hoaxalicious, plus it's a comic book, not an anime. (And IMO the drawings *are* that bad.) JuJube 23:32, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.