Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nationaal Park Lauwersmeer

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:05, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nationaal Park Lauwersmeer

Nationaal Park Lauwersmeer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No information, no context Bessel Dekker 00:52, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. Seems to be a real park. [1] and List of national parks of the Netherlands. Maybe expansion can be done by Wikipedia:WikiProject Netherlands--Lenticel (talk) 12:45, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: the article as it stood was speediable per A1 and A3, no content and no context. I've turned it into a stub. The subject of the article, a national park in the Netherlands, is definitely notable enough. I will translate the Dutch Wikipedia article asap. Aec·is·away talk 13:08, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep The article just needs to be expanded. Glennfcowan 13:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand National parks are notable enough. C mon 14:25, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Just for the sake of clarity: this article was not nominated for deletion for an alleged lack of notability, but for a lack of information and context. The version that was nominated for deletion contained only two words: beautiful areas.. Aec·is·away talk 14:48, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep the expanded version meets the requirements for a stub, and there seems to be incentive to expand it further. No reason to delete at this time. Hersfold (t/a/c) 19:14, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Very little information on a notable topic is a reason for a stub notice, not deletion. --Oakshade 16:17, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.