Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Winneke

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan Winneke

Nathan Winneke (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Seems not notible- no scrces apart from an MTV article. Complaints that it was written by the artist on the talk page (from anon) although no proof RT | Talk 17:12, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

  • OK, delete. I have made some edits to this article before (can't remember now what led me to it) and I believe the article history makes it extremely likely that it was written by the artist himself, e.g. the text removed here. - Fayenatic (talk) 00:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment Removal of controversial material doesn't necessarily signify a COI... see the guidlelines at WP:BLP. SingCal 01:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
      • I don't understand your point. It was me, an independent editor, who removed the controversial material. That material had been placed by the article's creator Fauxone who appears on strong internal evidence to be Nathan Winneke.
      • WP:BLP requires biographical articles to adhere strictly to Wikipedia's policies on verifiability and No original research. This article clearly fails to comply with those policies. I tagged it long ago as unreferenced; that tag was removed by Superchavo, apparently also an interested party, leading to its nomination for deletion. I am generally an inclusionist, but this one has to go. - Fayenatic (talk) 14:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
      • My bad. I thought that you were pointing to the removal of the text as a COI indicator. That's what I get for not reading histories well enough; apologies! Delete SingCal 18:40, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.