Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathan Whitington

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete as not even funny. DS 14:39, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nathan Whitington

• DeleteJoke site for fictional character, Nathan Whitington. If he isn't fictional then he's NN. Death by eating to much pudding???? Really? Google search on his name Nathan Whitington only brings up this person's personal page and Wikipedia articles. The external sites give 404 errors--Esemono 14:38, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Nearly patent nonsense, or lacking (real) context. My guess is this is a real but NN comedian for whom making a fake WP page is part of his show. --Allen 14:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, possible vanity and un-encyclopedic.--Gay Cdn 15:20, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable nonsense. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 19:34, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Just a comment - Nathan certainly is a real person, whether he is notable is entirely up to you! The death part is mainly a mockery of what is basically a very silly page - look at the comedic work names - not posted by myself I hasten to add!. Alspittle 21:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Yes Nathan certainly is a real person. I am a realtive of his and have been for quite some time! His 'comedic works' are silly indeed, and it was the sillyness that made them comedic works. Whether or not Nathan plans to release any of his work for download on the internet is debatable. May I suggest you contact his agent? I am a little troubled by the so called 'death' of Nathan. I can assure you that he is well and truly alive and still performing on the festival circuit. This page was brought to my attention by my long term companion.
• Delete I'm glad to hear that Nathan is real and still alive. The article, however, doesn't assert notability. Royalbroil 12:58, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.