Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Reeves

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:20, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Natalie Reeves

Natalie Reeves (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Found whilst doing an AfD clean-up: AfD created but not followed through; I suspect deletion is being requested for notability reasons. Procedural nomination - I have no opinion at this time. ➔ REDVEЯS isn't wearing pants 11:59, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

  • The following opinions were left on the article talk page by various new/single-purpose/anon users:
    • This page should be deleted. there is no relevant reason for her to have a page. She's just a contestant on a reality tv show, she hasn't even won. I don't know haw to do this so can someone please delete this page. Tinkerbell630 02:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)Tinkerbell630
    • I agree with Tinkerbell630. Additionally, a third of the "article" is nothing but conjecture; "She is amongst the most popular". -billy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.12.135.41 (talk) 05:41, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Don't delete until she leaves Beauty and the Geek —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.167.145.117 (talk) 00:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
    • Once someone gets on a popular reality show they are considered a celebrity and should be included on wiki. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatlock29 (talk • contribs) 05:09, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
    • She is insanely hot. Lets just leave it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Amyank489 (talk • contribs) 00:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as WP:NN unsupported by WP:RS. --Evb-wiki 12:10, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete There are so many reality shows around these days that simply being on one no longer automatically makes you notable.Alberon 13:14, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete nn (but concur hat she is insanely hot). JJL 14:11, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. scope_creep 15:20, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I don't mean to be funny, but since my nomination includes the words "Procedural nomination - I have no opinion at this time", which part are you agreeing with "per nom"? ➔ REDVEЯS isn't wearing pants 15:30, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • I sincerely hope it isn't the "not wearing pants" part. Hot or not, there's insufficient notability here for an article, so delete it. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 20:41, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • There's nothing wrong with not wearing pants :o) ➔ REDVEЯS isn't wearing pants 21:01, 31 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete not notable. --TGreenburgPR 06:44, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete non notable. -RiverHockey 13:36, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Speeddy delete not even close to notable. No reason to have such pages on WP. Turgidson 03:22, 4 November 2007 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.