Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naked Punch Review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. SushiGeek 07:06, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Naked Punch Review

A non-notable quarterly which began quite recently. Article is mostly an ad, and issues introduced via {{prod}} were never addressed or commented on. google home page Harmil 04:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep An interview with a notable figure such as Tariq Ali [1] would seem to establish some notability. The WP:PEACOCK terms need to be removed and the POV needs to be eliminated however.--Jersey Devil 01:56, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep, with above. Obviously written by someone new to Wikipedia interested in the magazine, but it's been around for a little while. Borderline but it's not run out of someone's basement. NTK 05:03, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. They have yet to impact popular culture. I say sit on it for twenty years, then ,renominate repost. T K E 05:37, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

• That was not sarcasm. T K E 05:38, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• It returns 36 Google hits, and the Alexa ranking is 1,638,637. T K E 05:47, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Do you mean "sit on it for twenty years, then repost?" or "sit on it for twenty years, then repost and renominate for deletion?" -- Kjkolb 08:50, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Oh oh, yes I meant repost. I'll take it then if they've done something encyclopedic. T K E 17:13, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

A literary journal that has at least 6 Wikipedia-notable contributors is not encyclopedic? Do they need a Pulitzer or what? NTK 19:56, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

Just my opinion; concensus so far is against me and that's just fine. 2¢, that's what a vote is! T K E 03:52, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep per Jersey and NTK. YellowPigNowNow 05:40, 8 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. Article needs clean-up. Tombride 16:13, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.