Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagarvadhu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Nomination withdrawn after the article was re-written. utcursch | talk 06:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Nagarvadhu

Nagarvadhu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Unsourced original research. Link under "resources" is not working, no relavent G-hits, reads like a POV essay Akradecki 16:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

    • Excellent rewrite, nom withdrawn. Akradecki 14:46, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Ageo020 (T • C) 18:02, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep The subject seems genuine and I've added a newspaper link. --Mereda 19:12, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Delete Massive POV problems; Many of the Internal Wiki links are inappropriate or ambigious (Institution, Priest, Divine, flavor). One newspaper article doesn't seem to be adequate for Notability.SkierRMH 06:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment The current article on courtesan is a mess as well and that lacks any Indian perspective. This one needs a rewrite but it's a start, and there are some English-language sources that meet WP:V. There's also a well-known Hindi book (some call it a classic) Vaishali ki Nagarvadhu by Acharya Chatursen which I've linked to Ambapali. Mereda 10:09, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, Merge with and Redirect to Devadasi  Doctor Bruno  13:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. Re-written. utcursch | talk 13:05, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - pov is not a reason to delete.Bakaman Bakatalk 05:20, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.