Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nader Khakpour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 04:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Nader Khakpour

Nader Khakpour (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Though quite amusing this is clearly a hoax. This article (and the addition of Nader Khakpour's name to a list of authors in the John Larroquette article, which I have already undone) are the only references to this author to be found anywhere on the internet. Anlala 05:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Fixed malformed nom. cab 06:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletions. cab 06:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete with a three-hole rubber spatula. Then scatter the ashes over a lake. No confirmation found, probable WP:HOAX. Did they ever solve the BJAODN issues? --Dhartung | Talk 07:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete with no sign of an author by this name nor of the book they supposedly wrote it seems a bit suspicious (for searching on Google), but the rest of the text makes it even more like a hoax than reality. --Mendors 07:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, I hate hoaxes. NawlinWiki 14:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• BJAODN, obvious (but amusing) hoax. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 16:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment As a spatula officionado and prominent member of the spatula community, I can say with authority that I have never heard of this person. ~ Infrangible 02:27, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.