Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Musclebear

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Bear community. -Splash^talk 21:49, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Musclebear

Neoplogism ≈ jossi ≈ 01:57, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

• I don't see why it should be deleted, it's a valid term, and not even that new of a term. If the bear community deserved an entry I don't see why this doesn't. --70.248.132.82 01:59, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment Twenty-two thousand hits on Google for "musclebear". I'm torn between Keep and Transwiki to Wiktionary, though, because I am not sure that there is enough verifiable material to make an article out of it. Most of the hits are for gyms and porn sites. Jkelly 03:00, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Bear community, which covers the same ground and even defines "muscle bear." Doctor Whom 03:25, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as per Doctor Whom. Jkelly 04:53, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect, per Doctor Whom. >: Roby Wayne ^{Talk • Hist} 23:08, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.