Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moving associations
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was merge. --Ezeu 11:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Moving associations
This article consists of nothing but a directory of links, possibly for the purposes of advertising. I am also nominating the following pages liked to by the original article for the same reason:
I have decided not to nominate IATA, also linked from the above article, since it actually contains content of merit. Tjohns ✎ 08:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Keep:Check if they are locally/nationwide, and of international interest. I believe you should not nominate them for deletion, rather merge links/info into one entry. Probably people search for this information. Associations are not neccessarily selling anything to customers. Akidd dublin•tl•ctr-l 09:14, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Merge The individual articles are substubs. If any accumulate content in the future they can always break out of the parent article at that stage. Dlyons493 Talk 09:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Merge per above but redirect OMNI to Omni; there are other entities that use all-caps OMNI. — stickguy (:^›)— home - talk - 14:41, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Merge all but IATA. Stifle (talk) 00:01, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete this article without prejudice as advertising or a link farm. If there is any content in the related individual articles, merge into an article with a different name. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 19:29, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
