Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monstermob

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Monstermob

Contested PROD. Apparent conflict of interest. Article is about a WP:CORP non-notable company selling ringtones and the like over the Internet. Smerdis of Tlön 12:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• I am withdrawing the nomination. Thanks for the research, Uncle G. Will do what I can to rewrite the article. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

• article in The Independent, another article in The Independent, another article in The Independent, another article in The Independent, article in The Financial Times, another article in The Financial Times, article in The Guardian, article in The Daily Telegraph, article in Mobile Entertainment, article in The Scotsman — It appears that the primary WP:CORP criterion is satisfied by this company. The fact that this article has been badly written, entirely relying as it does upon corporate autobiography and promotional blurb for its content rather than independent sources, is a matter for rewriting using proper sources, not deletion — i.e. application of {{cleanup-rewrite}} and {{advert}}. Several of the aforementioned can be used to expand the article in areas that the corporate autobiography is entirely silent upon. Keep. Uncle G 13:24, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.