Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monster Mack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. ELIMINATORJR TALK 23:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Monster Mack

Monster Mack (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article makes claims of notability, but claims cannot be verified. Indy wrestler who has appeared in non-notable feds. Biggest claim of notability is hosting a local TV show, but even that doesn't meet with WP:BIO Wildthing61476 19:31, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Um... this reads like nonsense, to start with, and there's nothing in here to indicate that any kind of notability has been met. Delete Tony Fox (arf!) review? 19:35, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: makes crazy assumptions, no credible claims that can be verified and certainly doesn't meet the entertainer section of WP:BIO. - Kneel17 19:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, unlike Monster Mack's face, this article is not too beautiful for Wikipedia. Fails WP:BIO and is completely silly... possible hoax, anyone? Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 20:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Surprisingly enough I found this site [1], so it's not a hoax, but I'd say it's promoting a nn website. Wildthing61476 20:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment This article denigrates the respectable field of fake wrestling. ~ Infrangible 16:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete WP:coi, WP:N. Primetime Wrestling may be notable, but I'm not seeing any proof he worked there. Calling the other two non-notable may be an understatement. ACW has Angelfire and Tripod pages that haven't been updated since Oct 2004, and only list 3 total cards. I can't narrow EAW down from a group of backyard wrestling groups with myspace and agnelfire pages.
Google searched for the writer of article [2] [3] and it appears he is also the subject.Horrorshowj 02:16, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
According to editor he's not the subject, he just works with him. Still WP:COI issue. This ACW does have a website, although it's not showing up on google which is bizarre. Another one does, but that's beside the point. I still don't think the subject is notable.Horrorshowj 00:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.