Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Cameron

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:33, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Monica Cameron

Monica Cameron (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Not notable. She may have appeared in about 48 movies but by porn star standards, that isn't particularly notable. Epbr123 02:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been added to the list of Porn star deletions. —Disavian (talk/contribs) 02:56, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Looking at WP:PORNBIO, she doesn't seem to be notable. --Dennisthe2 03:09, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete — unless notability can be proven. Philippe Beaudette 04:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Since when was doing anal sex in all of one's films a notability criteria? I don't believe that morality should equal notability, but if this is the best the article's author can muster, then that's a pretty pathetic stab at notability... Pat Payne 20:27, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete fails WP:PORNBIO, I'd also like to point out that the above editor's claim that doing anal sex in all of her movies was a "stab at notability" made me wince :) EliminatorJR Talk 00:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Yeah... I meant that in the most harmless way possible as a figure of speech, but looking on it again....yikes :) Pat Payne 01:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Note Nominator has significantly changed his nominating statement since the beginning of this discussion.LaMenta3 02:40, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete though I almost want to vote keep because EliminatorJR just made me laugh so hard with the "stab" comment! hahahaha but yeah does not meet WP:BIO ⇒ SWATJester On Belay! 05:34, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.