Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monad Nocensiocus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 05:20, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Monad Nocensiocus

Monad Nocensiocus (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. Non-notable philosophy that has exactly one Google hit — this very article. Dubious at best, hoax at worst. Realkyhick 17:15, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Can anyone verify the latin translation given, or is the translation the "bad joke"?--SarekOfVulcan 18:35, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Monad is really a term in philosophy, math, and physics, and nocens means 'bad', and iocus means 'joke' (per online translators). The philosophical underpinnings of the article don't match the quantum physics bent of the cited author, and all sorts of creative Google searches turned up nada. I think we've been had. Eliz81(talk)(contribs) 20:17, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Although I can appreciate an elaborate hoax, it still doesn't belong here. "Iocus" means "joke" but "nocens" is "harmful" rather than "bad". And as bad as my Latin may be, a word like "nocensiocus" seems grammatically impossible. Plus, in a different article, the author of this hoax attempted to slip in "Monad Nocensiocus" as a synonym for samsara, which totally contradicts his own definition. Nice try, User:Juillet2007. --Targeman 00:50, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete I removed the speedy tag because this theory is attributed to a blue-link theorist. So although a modicum of notability was asserted denied the speediness, there still is no notability in actuality here so it ought to be deleted. Carlossuarez46 21:45, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per all of the above. Links go nowhere. Funny. Bearian 21:57, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.