Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobikade

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Mobikade

Mobikade (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable website. Alexa rank 1,527,396. Asoed (talk) 08:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak keep The article does parts to assert its significance but I am unable to find mention of Mobikade in UK-based online newspapers. Cloudz679 (talk) 08:12, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Web Notability doesn't require a high ranking. Google stats and other forms of stats shouldn't be used alone to determine if something is notable or not. -Jahnx (talk) 08:43, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Comment. There are no offline sources to verify the article, so how do you suggest notability is determined for this page? Cloudz679 (talk) 08:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Reply here is a online link to Mobile Entertainment, UK an Feb 19, 2008 article. That is in addition the the independent websites listed as references in the article. So it meets the critera. Which would fullfill the critera 1 or 3. It doesn't have to be an offline source. However if you want to argue the 2nd critera The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization then you have an arguement, however it only has to accomplish one of these criteras. -Jahnx (talk) 08:55, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep per Cloudz679, the sources look decent enough, although it'd be better if we established exactly what kind of websites those were (if they were only for promoting this website, then I would change to delete).--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 14:24, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep per Cloudz679. --Oldak Quill 20:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.