Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobcasting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 15:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Mobcasting

Mobcasting (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

neologism. someone makes up a word on their blog, and suddenly it needs a wiki article? also, the article almost reads like a blog, other than the first paragraph. Skrewler 02:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete NNNeologism. (ooh, do I get an article for my dubbing a 'non-notable-neologism' that way?!) SkierRMH 02:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• 56,000 hits = Keep--Deglr6328 02:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:NEO should clear up any misconceptions anyone has over using Ghits for a neologism: "We must cite reliable secondary sources such as books and papers about the term — not books and papers that use the term. Neologisms that are in wide use — but for which there are no treatments in secondary sources — are not yet ready for use and coverage in Wikipedia." Any questions? -- Antepenultimate 03:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. YAWN (yet another worthless neologism) Dragomiloff 03:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• BAHLEET (Strong Delete). --Staos 03:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. YAWN is exactly right. MER-C 04:35, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - non-notable made-up word. no reliable sources. and no, bloggers and blogs are definitely not reliable sources. many external links. - Femmina 10:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO. --Wizardman 21:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NEO and because article has no references and all external links are to blogs, rather than unbiased sources. cacophony 23:52, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Send it to sleep with the fishes (I know it's not referring to that kind of mob, but I couldn't resist). Danny Lilithborne 01:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete with extreme prejudice. Neologism. Mirror, Mirror, on the wall... 06:01, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.