Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mirago

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 02:39, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Mirago

It's a POV attack against a non-notable company. The whole thing should just be deleted. Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 00:21, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

• I speedily removed the attack bits. No vote. FCYTravis 00:35, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a search engine company. -- JJay 01:58, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
  • It's still a really crappy article though. --Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 06:41, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
  • That's probably true. But are they really as NN as you say? -- JJay 07:00, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, Mirago.co.uk has a Alexa rank of 10,070. It's not Google, but not all that bad either for a company providing internet services. They seem to get visitors. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:24, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. If it was up to my opinion I'd vote delete. But, as much as I may dislike it, they are notable. --Ezeu 13:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep With attack bits removed, is ok as a starter stub. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 17:57, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep looks fine to me now.Gator (talk) 22:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep looks fine but needs expansion.Gateman1997 00:57, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep the fixed version. Stifle 10:15, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.