The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 18:57, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
Seems to be little more than a collection of trivia (a non-notable band, a bunch of original research and some soapboxing) whose only connection is a phrase with little evidence of widespread usage (or more importantly the references to support a verifiable article). ~MatticusTC 09:21, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete, per nom. The article context is unclear, contains nonsense, etc. --Sigma 7 11:15, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.