Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Militaryphotos.net (2 nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Consensus to Keep. HighInBC ^{(Need help? Ask me)} 21:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Militaryphotos.net

Militaryphotos.net (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

2nd nom. 1st nom here. Still fails WP:WEB. - crz crztalk 03:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Ral315 (talk) 04:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Operation Enduring Freedom or other sites that the article "captures." Bearly541 05:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - alexa = 12,157: [1]. MER-C 06:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, has produced mainstream, international media coverage. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 15:14, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable website esp in light of Finnish incident. NeoFreak 18:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The Fox Man of Fire 20:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep; Notable for North Korea photos linked from many other sites Noclip 21:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep per above. Cbrown1023 22:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Keep from the above statements. --63.252.66.227 21:27, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete While some of the keep comments here, and in the first AFD, would meet the standards of WP:WEB if they were sourced, nothing relevant is sourced. Where is the sourcing to the coverage by external media? Where is the evidence (as opposed to the claims) that the content is redistributed? GRBerry 03:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.